<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Squared &#187; Climate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greensquared.com/blog/tag/climate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greensquared.com/blog</link>
	<description>We have two green objectives: &#34;green&#34;, as in environmental sustainability, and &#34;green&#34;, as in cost savings. That’s Green²; that&#039;s Green Squared!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Buildings Meet The Biggest Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/05/buildings-meet-the-biggest-loser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/05/buildings-meet-the-biggest-loser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 14:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Bragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retrofits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greensquared.com/blog/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the EPA: Video from Bob Harper from Biggest Loser introduces Energy Fitness for Buildings WASHINGTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is sponsoring the first national energy efficiency contest of its kind, featuring 14 commercial buildings from across the country. While trimming kilowatt hours off is their bottom line, they’ll also save money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=buildingcontest.index">EPA</a>:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKKp-_01k_Y' >Video from Bob Harper from Biggest Loser introduces Energy Fitness for Buildings</a></p>
<p>WASHINGTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is sponsoring the first national energy efficiency contest of its kind, featuring 14 commercial buildings from across the country. While trimming kilowatt hours off is their bottom line, they’ll also save money and help fight climate change. The building that sheds the most energy waste on a percentage basis will be declared the winner at EPA’s final weigh-in on Oct. 26, 2010.</p>
<p>“It’s time for buildings to tighten their belts and we’re happy to help them go on an energy diet,” said Gina McCarthy, assistant administrator for air and radiation. “Cutting energy use will reduce their monthly expenses and their carbon footprint, showing that environmental protection and economic growth can go hand in hand.”</p>
<p>Nearly 200 applications were received for EPA’s National Building Competition and the 14 finalists will be judged on their energy performance from Sept. 1, 2009 to Aug. 31, 2010. The energy use of each building is being monitored with EPA’s Energy Star online energy measurement and tracking tool, Portfolio Manager. Television personality Bob Harper will also provide energy fitness tips for the contestants through a series of videos that will be available on the Web site. </p>
<p>EPA’s National Building Competition contestants are:<br />
·	522 Fifth Avenue Building, New York, N.Y.<br />
·	1525 Wilson Boulevard Building, Arlington, Va.<br />
·	Crystal River Elementary School, Carbondale, Colo.<br />
·	Courtyard by Marriott San Diego Downtown, San Diego, Calif.<br />
·	JCPenney Store 1778, Orange, Calif.<br />
·	Maplewood Mall, St. Paul, Minn.<br />
·	Memorial Arts Building at the Woodruff Arts Center, Atlanta, Ga.<br />
·	Morrison Residence Hall at UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, N.C.<br />
·	Sears, Glen Burnie, Md.<br />
·	Sheraton Austin Hotel, Austin, Texas<br />
·	Solon Family Health Center at the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio<br />
·	Tucker Residence Hall at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C.<br />
·	Van Holten Primary School, Bridgewater, N.J.<br />
·	Virginia Beach Convention Center, Virginia Beach, Va.</p>
<p>The competition Web site will provide profiles of each contestant and chronicle their progress as well as feature advice for contestants from EPA and leading building efficiency specialists. Each building will also participate in mid-point and final contest weigh-ins and the results will be posted online at the competition Web site. </p>
<p>Energy use in commercial buildings accounts for 17 percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions at a cost of more than $100 billion per year. On average, 30 percent of the energy used in commercial buildings is wasted. Thousands of businesses and organizations work with the EPA’s Energy Star program and are saving billions of dollars and preventing millions of tons of greenhouse gas emissions from entering our atmosphere each year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/05/buildings-meet-the-biggest-loser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>100% renewable energy feasible by 2050</title>
		<link>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/05/100-renewable-energy-feasible-by-2050/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/05/100-renewable-energy-feasible-by-2050/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 19:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Bragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greensquared.com/blog/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consulting giant McKinsey recently concluded a feasibility study to determine if electricity from 100% renewable resources was possible. They determined that it was very feasible by 2050. The study concluded that along with renewable energy being 100% feasible, it was also a reliable and economically sound energy decision. Interesting side stat: Germany currently has one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consulting giant <a href="http://www.pv-tech.org/news/_a/mckinsey_study_finds_electricity_from_renewable_energy_is_a_feasible_goal_b">McKinsey recently concluded a feasibility study</a> to determine if electricity from 100% renewable resources was possible.  They determined that it was very feasible by 2050.</p>
<p>The study concluded that along with renewable energy being 100% feasible, it was also a reliable and economically sound energy decision.</p>
<p>Interesting side stat:  Germany currently has one of the biggest renewable energies markets in the world with 2009 showing a 16.1% increase in the total share of electricity from renewable resources. </p>
<p>Other <a href="http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Energy_Resources_Materials/Strategy_Analysis/How_companies_manage_sustainability_McKinsey_Global_Survey_results__2558?pagenum=4">interesting survey notes from McKinsey</a>:</p>
<p>More than <strong>50 percent of executives consider sustainability</strong>—the management of environmental, social, and governance issues—“very” or “extremely” important in a wide range of areas, including new-product development, reputation building, and overall corporate strategy.</p>
<p>Yet companies are not taking a proactive approach to managing sustainability: only around 30 percent of executives say their companies actively seek opportunities to invest in sustainability or embed it in their business practices, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/05/100-renewable-energy-feasible-by-2050/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Earth Day!</title>
		<link>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/04/happy-earth-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/04/happy-earth-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Bragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retrofits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greensquared.com/blog/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today marks the 40th anniversary of Earth Day. In anticipation of the day, I offer you the following articles for good reading: Green leader Whole Foods plans to go greener The Company has plans to reduce its energy consumption 25 percent per square foot during the next five years. Save energy and money by retrofitting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today marks the 40th anniversary of Earth Day.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.earthday.org/earthday2010"><img src="http://edayorgtrellon.earthdaynetwork.netdna-cdn.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/dropshadow_detail/campaigns/grass%20edn_0.jpg" alt="Earth Day 2010" /></a></p>
<p>In anticipation of the day, I offer you the following articles for good reading:</p>
<p><a href="http://dallas.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/2010/04/19/daily19.html">Green leader Whole Foods plans to go greener</a><br />
<em>The Company has plans to reduce its energy consumption 25 percent per square foot during the next five years.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.gbj.com/content.cfm?action=story&#038;WikiID=8191">Save energy and money by retrofitting lighting</a><br />
<em>Retrofits using fluorescent technologies reduce lighting energy consumption (kWh) and lighting demand (kW) as much as 50 percent.</em></p>
<p>It also catches me up on a bunch of stuff that I wanted to blog about, but ran out of time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/04/happy-earth-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Climate Bill Coming?</title>
		<link>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/04/new-climate-bill-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/04/new-climate-bill-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Bragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greensquared.com/blog/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reuters reports that Senators Kerry, Graham, and Lieberman may release their long-awaited climate change bill (KGL Bill) next week, after months of trying to find the &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; for industry and environmentalists, and Democrats, and at least a few Republicans. One critical question is what will become of state programs like the Regional Greenhouse Gas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reuters reports that S<a href="http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c93e253ef01347fe6ecd1970c">enators Kerry, Graham, and Lieberman may release their long-awaited climate change bill</a> (KGL Bill) next week, after months of trying to find the &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; for industry and environmentalists, and Democrats, and at least a few Republicans.  One critical question is what will become of state programs like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in the Northeastern states and the California climate program, as well as the Western Climate Initiative and the Midwestern Climate Accord, which are the two other multi-state climate programs under development.</em></p>
<p>Interesting that the bill&#8217;s drafters are across the political spectrum with one R, one D, and one I.  This should be interesting to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/04/new-climate-bill-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coal can be cleaner than solar&#8230; Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/04/coal-can-be-cleaner-than-solar-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/04/coal-can-be-cleaner-than-solar-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Bragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greensquared.com/blog/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like contrarian points of view as much as the next guy (perhaps more my friends would say), but this guy brings contrarian to a whole other level. This CNN/Money video is worth a look. Embedded video from CNNMoney.com Video This VC is invested in a company which turns CO2 into building materials.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like contrarian points of view as much as the next guy (perhaps more my friends would say), but this guy brings contrarian to a whole other level.   This CNN/Money video is worth a look.  </p>
<p><script src='http://i.cdn.turner.com/money/.element/script/3.0/video/evp/module.js?loc=dom&#038;vid=/video/fortune/2010/04/14/bsg_vinod_khosla_coal.fortune' type='text/javascript'></script><noscript>Embedded video from <a href='http://money.cnn.com/video'>CNNMoney.com Video</a></noscript></p>
<p>This VC is invested in a company which turns CO2 into building materials.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/04/coal-can-be-cleaner-than-solar-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything&#8217;s bigger in Texas&#8230;see solar and wind</title>
		<link>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/02/everythings-bigger-in-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/02/everythings-bigger-in-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Bragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greensquared.com/blog/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas already leads the country in wind power, thanks to the windy west Texas plains, according to the EPA. Many in Texas now believe that Texas could also lead in solar. &#8220;We actually are a perfect environment, economically and thermodynamically, as a raw resource for solar, but it hasn&#8217;t taken off,&#8221; said Michael E. Webber, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas already leads the country in wind power, thanks to the windy west Texas plains, according to the EPA.  Many in Texas now believe that <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/healthscience/stories/DN-solarhomes_22met.ART0.State.Edition1.4bb1d54.html">Texas could also lead in solar</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;We actually are a perfect environment, economically and thermodynamically, as a raw resource for solar, but it hasn&#8217;t taken off,&#8221; said Michael E. Webber, an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Texas to the Dallas Morning News.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The PUC&#8217;s solar program would be based on the existing renewable portfolio standards, a requirement dating to 1999 for electric companies to include sources such as wind, solar and other renewable sources in their energy mixes.</p>
<p>Texas&#8217; renewable energy standards, among the most aggressive in the country, have been so successful that electric companies met the 2009 goal by 2005. The Legislature responded in 2005 by setting more ambitious targets for 2015 and 2025.</p>
<p>Nearly all of Texas&#8217; growth in renewable energy has been in wind power, which increased fourfold over 10 years. Other renewable power sources remained afterthoughts.</p>
<p>Solar power was especially held back by its cost, technological challenges and lack of transmission lines from sun-rich West Texas to energy-hungry cities.</p>
<p>Legislators recognized the lag with a 2005 mandate that Texas energy include at least 500 megawatts of new power from sources other than wind by 2015. The state also took steps to provide more electric transmission lines.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Interestingly, <a href="http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/progress_alerts.cfm/pa_id=304">the DOE announced a new study</a> which was carried out by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and AWS Truewind, finds that the contiguous 48 states have the potential to generate up to 37 million gigawatt hours annually. By contrast, total U.S. electricity generation from all sources was roughly 4 million gigawatt hours in 2009.  Texas was estimated to be able to contribute 6.5 million gigawatts of that amount or 17.5%.</p>
<p>Here are the wind potential estimates for the contiguous 48:<br />
<img src="http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov/images/windmaps/us_windmap80m_561w.jpg" alt="US Wind potential" /></p>
<p>In a similar note, I just noticed that <a href="http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/a-utility-will-help-homeowners-go-solar/">TXU Energy, a Texas retail electric provider, is instituting a program to help 400 homeowners <strong>lease</strong> their rooftop solar</a>.  Very interesting. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/02/everythings-bigger-in-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Change / Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/02/climate-change-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/02/climate-change-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/02/climate-change-global-warming/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the record breaking D.C. snow, many detractors of climate change / global warming science are feeling emboldened in their argument against the overwhelming weight of scientific evidence. First, the record breaking D.C. snow is of itself evidence of climate change as one of the key pillars of climate change science is an increase in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the record breaking D.C. snow, many detractors of climate change / global warming science are feeling emboldened in their argument against the overwhelming weight of scientific evidence.  First, the record breaking D.C. snow is of itself evidence of climate change as one of the key pillars of climate change science is an increase in extreme weather of all types.  Second, the detractors of climate change fail to offer any explanation as to what is currently going on in Vancouver, B.C., with the Winter Olympics.  Highs in the 50’s and no snow; in fact they are having to use dry ice and other man made snow solutions. What’s up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/02/climate-change-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Public Company Disclosures Required about Climate Risk?</title>
		<link>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/02/new-public-company-disclosures-required-about-climate-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/02/new-public-company-disclosures-required-about-climate-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Bragg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greensquared.com/blog/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been a part of more than my share of 10Ks and S-1s through the years, so I found this blog post very interesting. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an interpretive release on February 2, 2010, entitled Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change. The release does not create any new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been a part of more than my share of 10Ks and S-1s through the years, so I found this blog post very interesting.</p>
<p><em><br />
<blockquote>The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an interpretive release on February 2, 2010, entitled Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change. The release does not create any new rules or change any of the SEC’s disclosure requirements. Instead, its purpose is to provide guidance to public companies regarding the SEC’s existing disclosure requirements as they apply to climate change matters.</p>
<p>The SEC states that the four principal areas, which are discussed in more detail below, in which its rules may require disclosure relating to climate change are:</p>
<p>• The impact of existing or pending legislation or regulations that relate to climate change;</p>
<p>• The effect of treaties or other international accords;</p>
<p>• The consequences, both positive and negative, including reputational harm, of regulations or business trends; and</p>
<p>• The physical impacts of climate change.</p></blockquote>
<p></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c93e253ef0120a87aa37d970b">You can read the full blog post here.</a></p>
<p>Although the SEC has not mandated anything, this looks certainly like an issue that will soon be commonplace in all US public filings. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.greensquared.com/blog/2010/02/new-public-company-disclosures-required-about-climate-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

